Skip to content


Composition with lines and dots

On some days–especially cold rainy ones like we’ve had all week–I have to work a little harder to find a laugh. My latest trick is pretending I’m an art critic narrating the repetitive activities of my day.  Last night, for example, I assumed the identity of my puffed-up college art history professor. He pronounced “Van Gogh” like this: “Van- GAH-HAH.” Like he was choking. Every time a painting by the Dutch artist came up on the screen, I had to suppress a laugh akin to the one that would overtake me as a kid at my grandmother’s Baptist church in rural North Carolina. Think Maya Angelou’s scene in I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings. (“Preach it!!!!”)

Bending down to sweep up the dinnertime detritus from the floor, I cranked up my old professor’s 1/10 British Accent (he’s American but studied at Oxford). Here’s what he (we) said about the scene I found under the table:

DSC_0374

“Here we have a still image from a performance piece by two American  artists–ages 3.5 and 6 years. We see that several black beans have escaped–one-by-one–from the entrapment of their pressed quesadilla enclosure. These legumes noirs have come to a place of quiet repose on the floor, among a forest of contrasting vertical steel dining chair legs. The orbital form of the frijoles and the shaftlike metal tubes erupt from the overly patinaed tableau of the floor. We endure the unbearable tension of the soft legumes, vulnerable and poised for certain destruction.  For we know that the artists’ feet are mere seconds away from squashing the beans as flat as the tortilla from whence they came. Yet, like the phoenix of lore, the beans will rise from this perilous life to be be reborn as smears against carpets, sofa cushions–or bedspreads. From there, time will only tell when they will be carried next: into the rapids of the Maytag or–atom by atom–onto the clothes of couch-sitters or the slumbering artists themselves…”

Posted in Art 101.


3 Responses

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. Carolyn Morgan says

    Not not just legumes noir,
    raisins or snap, crackle, poppins.
    You get-away food bits
    scattered there like remnants
    from a circus-
    come-to-town-
    then-left.

    My ceiling bears runes
    of tomato juice gone airborne
    set free from Tommie Tippie’s hold.
    Twas a tiny protesting hand
    that swung in perfect collide
    with mommie’s offering hand.

    A sheet of red, a’ winging –
    ceiling-ward in liquid flight
    and curtain-ward, window
    sill-ward, table-ward,
    and floor .

    Bitter fate – of once tomatoes
    growing
    in sunny glory – were plucked,
    gave their very essence,
    their life blood
    to end up like this ?
    To anoint
    my humble breakfast room ?

    Fruit’s sad misspent after-life,
    yet made immortal
    as curtains’ stains –
    and droplet shaped
    dissolved ceiling paint,

    Reminders all
    of that decided “NO!”
    from toddler’s thumbs down vote.

  2. William Morgan says

    In Woody Allen’s film “Manhattan” (now thirty years ago!), the protagonist, played by great nebbish himself, reacts angrily to the anti-art tirade unleashed by Diane Keaton’s character, Mary, where she talks of an Academy of the Overrated (including Gustav Mahler, Isak Dinesen, Jung, F. Scott Fitzgerald, Lenny Bruce, Walt Whitman, Ingmar Bergman).
    “I’m mad because I don’t like that pseudo-intellectual garbage. And she was pedantic. Van Gogh. (Pronouncing it ‘Goch’) Did you hear that? She said: Van Goch … Like an Arab she spoke … and if she had made one more remark about Bergman, I would have knocked her other contact lens out.”

  3. Ellie says

    Hilarious. I love it.



Some HTML is OK

or, reply to this post via trackback.